diff --git a/.beads/issues.jsonl b/.beads/issues.jsonl
index 57c2815..757bc72 100644
--- a/.beads/issues.jsonl
+++ b/.beads/issues.jsonl
@@ -8,7 +8,10 @@
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-cbd","title":"Mine critique transcript for named failures to avoid","description":"Why: CLAUDE.md step 2 uses the critique transcript (Nikos Salingaros and others analysing\nthe winning competition proposal) as a source of specific, concrete failures - not vague\ncomplaints - so the condensed brief and later narratives can explicitly steer clear of\nthem. This transcript is a 1352-line unstructured conversational recording (references\neye-tracking studies of the losing design), so it needs a deliberate reading pass rather\nthan a quick grep.\n\nWhat: Read ref/youtube-transcript.txt in full and extract a list of specific named\nfailures of the winning proposal (e.g. illegible circulation, inhuman scale relative to\nvisitors, hostile/blank facades, disconnection from urban context, parking treated as a\nprimary experience, meaningless shed-like massing - confirm and expand on actual read).\nFor each failure, note: (a) a short label, (b) the concrete evidence/quote from the\ntranscript, (c) which stakeholder(s) it harms, and (d) which pattern(s) in\n\"A Pattern Language Ecuador National Museum.md\" directly counters it (e.g. shielded/small\nparking lots patterns 97/103 counter \"parking as primary experience\"; circulation realms\npattern 98 counters \"illegible circulation\"). Write up as ref/critique-failures.md.","acceptance_criteria":"ref/critique-failures.md lists concrete, evidenced failures (not paraphrased vibes), each mapped to at least one countering pattern from the subset","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"Bruno Postle","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-18T19:38:10Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:36Z","started_at":"2026-07-18T20:00:17Z","closed_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:36Z","close_reason":"brief-condensed.md, critique-failures.md, and CLAUDE.md output-format decision all written","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"ecuador-cbd","depends_on_id":"ecuador-7vi","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2026-07-18T20:47:40Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","metadata":"{}"}],"dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":1,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-mcq","title":"Condense official brief into genuine human-needs facts","description":"Why: CLAUDE.md step 2 requires distilling the official Stage 1 call documents down to\nwhat serves genuine human needs. The first pass of this task under-weighted one thing:\n\"human needs\" framing must not be used to reduce the National Collection itself to a\nbare scale number - the actual holdings are a legitimate, central program driver (what\npeople will actually encounter) and later narratives, especially the indigenous/\ncommunity stakeholder one, need to reference real, specific heritage content rather than\nan abstract \"collection\". Also new source material has arrived: Nikos Salingaros\ncontributed ref/Casa de la Memoria Andina - National Museum Narrative-Kimi.txt, a\nproject-data-plus-narrative document that already states site/program parameters\n(sometimes rounded differently than the official brief, e.g. \"13,000 sqm\" vs the\nofficial 13,004.65 sqm) - reconcile any discrepancies against the official brief rather\nthan silently picking one.\n\nWhat: Read ref/Muna Technical Bases for Stage 1.txt (Overview, National Museum of\nEcuador history/mission, National Collection reserve breakdown, Location section) and\nref/Muna ANNEX-1/ANNEX-2 (confirm ANNEX-2 is administrative-only beyond blank\nteam-portfolio tables). Write ref/brief-condensed.md with two clearly separate parts:\n\n1. FACTS: institutional mission/history, site data (13,004.65 sqm plot, Av. Eloy Alfaro\n   / Av. de la Republica, Inaquito, La Pradera Urban Action Unit, opposite La Carolina\n   park, Metro/Trolleybus access), minimum 25,000 sqm building area, broad program\n   categories (exhibition, conservation and research, education, public areas,\n   landscape). Note there is no detailed room-by-room spatial program in the source\n   docs.\n\n2. THE NATIONAL COLLECTION (do not reduce to numbers only): for each of the 5 reserves,\n   give both the scale AND representative named/typed content, since this is what\n   visitors and community stakeholders will actually encounter:\n   - Archaeology Reserve: 62,103 pieces - lithic tools/obsidian points through Manteno\n     stone seats and the Tolita Sun.\n   - Colonial and Republican Reserve: 5,353 pieces - colonial altarpieces, sculptures by\n     Bernardo de Legarda, works by Joaquin Pinto.\n   - Modern and Contemporary Art Reserve: 2,538 works - Luis A. Martinez, Araceli\n     Gilbert, and other 20th/21st-century Ecuadorian artists.\n   - Human Sciences Library: ~210,000 bibliographic items (1480-present), including the\n     Jijon y Caamano and Isaac Barrera collections - a major, currently under-served\n     holding, not just an adjunct to the galleries.\n   - Historical Archive: 918,673 documents - colonial manuscripts, photographs, musical\n     scores, sound/radio recordings, cartography, posters.\n   Also carry forward the brief's own framing: the museum currently exhibits under 1% of\n   its collection due to space/infrastructure limits - this is a core human-needs problem\n   the new building must solve, distinct from square-footage alone.\n\nCross-check both parts against ref/Casa de la Memoria Andina - National Museum\nNarrative-Kimi.txt's stated project parameters and flag (don't silently resolve) any\nnumeric discrepancies for the chassis-extraction task to settle.","acceptance_criteria":"ref/brief-condensed.md has a distinct National Collection section naming representative holdings per reserve (not just counts), keeps the under-1%-exhibited problem, and flags any numeric discrepancies with the Salingaros narrative rather than silently overriding either source","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"Bruno Postle","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-18T19:38:05Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:35Z","started_at":"2026-07-18T20:00:13Z","closed_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:35Z","close_reason":"brief-condensed.md, critique-failures.md, and CLAUDE.md output-format decision all written","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"ecuador-mcq","depends_on_id":"ecuador-7vi","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2026-07-18T20:47:35Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","metadata":"{}"}],"dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":1,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-7vi","title":"Museum counter-proposal: brief → chassis → narratives → consistency check","description":"Why: This is the project's core deliverable per CLAUDE.md - a pattern-language-driven\ncounter-proposal narrative for the National Museum of Ecuador, published to influence\npublic debate while the winning competition scheme is on hold. The pattern subset and\nform-language grammar are already in ref/; the brief has not yet been condensed and no\nnarratives have been written.\n\nWhat: Parent epic tracking the full remaining pipeline: condense brief facts + mine\ncritique transcript for named failures -\u003e fix shared design invariants in one chassis\ndocument -\u003e draft four stakeholder narratives against that shared chassis -\u003e cross-check\nall four for fidelity to patterns/brief/grammar and mutual consistency.","acceptance_criteria":"All 4 narratives exist at the agreed location, are mutually consistent, trace every design claim to the pattern subset/chassis/brief, and the cross-check issue (ecuador-7vi.5) is closed with no unresolved findings.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-18T19:36:29Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-18T20:15:40Z","closed_at":"2026-07-18T20:15:40Z","close_reason":"Full pipeline complete: brief condensed, critique failures mined, chassis extracted, all four stakeholder narratives written and cross-checked with no unresolved findings","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
+{"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-lco","title":"Write follow-up paper: Postle \u0026 Salingaros, plan-layout extension of LLM pattern synthesis","description":"Follow-up to Postle \u0026 Salingaros, 'LLM and Pattern Language Synthesis: A Hybrid Tool for Human-Centered Architectural Design,' Buildings 2025, 15, 2400. Target venue: Buildings (sequel paper). Location in repo: new top-level paper/ directory.\n\nUses the Ecuador National Museum counter-proposal (this repo) as the worked example. Reports a real-world deployment of an extended version of the original chain, in an active contested public process, and extends the method with a form-language intermediate layer.\n\nAgreed outline:\n1. Intro - recap original pattern-\u003enarrative-\u003eimage chain; frame this paper as reporting a live, high-stakes public-advocacy deployment (not a hypothetical case study) plus a method extension.\n2. Method extension - three inputs instead of two: pattern language (ref/A Pattern Language Ecuador National Museum.md) + form language (ref/Ecuadorian_Form_Language_Grammar.md, per Salingaros' Chapter 11 'Two Languages for Architecture') + project brief/critique material (ref/brief-condensed.md, ref/critique-failures.md).\n3. Templating the form-language step - templates/form-language-prompt-template.md generalizes Salingaros' bespoke two-step prompting (docs/salingaros-*-prompt.md) into a reusable placeholder instrument (typology/region/site-climate/historical strata), analogous to how the pattern-subset curation tool worked in the original paper.\n4. Worked example - Ecuador museum counter-proposal as two independent runs from shared inputs: our four-stakeholder-narrative track (narratives/ -\u003e docs/counter-proposal.md) vs. Salingaros' parallel track (docs/3.Casa-de-la-Memoria-*, docs/images-salingaros/). Same pattern subset + form-language grammar, divergent narratives/images.\n5. Reception - July 23 symposium (ref/youtube-transcript-2026-07-23.txt) as informal peer engagement: praise for aesthetic consistency of 'spirit' across images, but substantive critique from a practicing architect (Pablo Alvarez Funes) on record: 'this Nikos did not create a plan,' 'these are flavors, not solutions,' hallucinations visible at corners, need for licensed architects to make forms buildable.\n6. Drawbacks - images are inspirational/illustrative, not derived from one coordinated floor plan, so spatial claims across images aren't guaranteed to reconcile (small real instance in this repo: entrance-portal image showing three arches vs. a five-bay text description, caption loosened rather than image/text rewritten). No mechanism yet for genuine public participation beyond unfiltered social-media image voting, which the transcript warns degenerates without curation.\n7. Next steps - PROPOSE (not prototype, per user decision) plan-layout generation as a missing stage: mining the pattern subset's implicit spatial/adjacency relationships (e.g. project-chassis.md's named circulation realms) into an explicit layout layer that narratives/images could be derived from, rather than each being independently invented. See ecuador-\u003cbubble-diagram-issue-id\u003e for a possible prototype that could get folded into this section if it happens in time.\n8. Conclusion.\n\nDeliverable for now: outline draft as a new Markdown file under paper/ (not full prose yet - discussed and agreed structure only).","notes":"Outline draft delivered: paper/outline.md (8 sections per agreed structure). Section 4 updated per author note (2026-07-24): Salingaros' ChatGPT images are more compelling/photo-realistic than Postle's Midjourney images, cause unknown - paper's illustrative material should draw primarily on the Salingaros/ChatGPT set, with the Midjourney set used only for the explicit two-track comparison in section 4. Follow-up investigation tracked separately as ecuador-gup (optional, lower priority than the plan-layout work in ecuador-0u5).","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-24T20:33:48Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-24T20:46:17Z","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-vay","title":"Generalize a reusable form-language prompt template","description":"The original Postle \u0026 Salingaros paper (buildings-15-02400-v2.txt) only used a\npattern-language fragment as LLM context. This project's key methodological\naddition is pairing that with a form-language grammar (tectonic/spatial/color/\nornament rules) - see ref/Ecuadorian_Form_Language_Grammar.md as the concrete\nexample output for this project.\n\nWe now have the evidence needed to generalize this into a reusable instrument:\n- docs/salingaros-form-language-prompt.md - the actual prompts Salingaros used\n  to generate the Ecuadorian form-language grammar (initial + follow-up,\n  iterating toward: research vernacular/historical building images across a\n  region, synthesize into a generative grammar rather than a style to copy,\n  narrow to the specific project's climate/site while drawing vocabulary from\n  the wider region, and produce a structured document meant to feed a later\n  narrative-generation prompt rather than to generate images directly).\n- ref/Salingaros-Chapter-11-Two-Languages-for-Architecture.md - the theoretical\n  basis (pattern language = human/organizational rules, form language =\n  geometric/tectonic rules; the two must be linked or the pattern language\n  can't connect to built form).\n- ref/Ecuadorian_Form_Language_Grammar.md - the worked example: its structure\n  (tectonic sequence, spatial lexicon, composition syntax, color/ornament\n  systems with coded references like CR1/OP2/OP4) is the target shape for the\n  template's output.\n\nNext step: distill these into a prompt TEMPLATE (with placeholders for region,\nclimate, site, and building-typology specifics) that could be handed to an LLM\nto generate a form-language grammar for any locale/project, in the same\nstructural format as the Ecuadorian example. This is a generalization of the\nmethod, likely relevant to a future paper or revision of the Buildings 2025\nmethodology alongside the existing pattern-language-only approach.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"Bruno Postle","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-24T18:29:07Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-24T18:52:02Z","started_at":"2026-07-24T18:34:49Z","closed_at":"2026-07-24T18:52:02Z","close_reason":"Wrote templates/form-language-prompt-template.md, reviewed for failure modes (hallucination/unverified search claims, region-scale coherence, buildability disclaimer, sacred-motif caution) and applied fixes","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-j4n","title":"Write AI image-generation prompts for the counter-proposal's illustrations","description":"Why: docs/counter-proposal.md is the public presentation document and has illustration placeholders throughout (11 markers, several covering more than one distinct scene, ~13 images total) that need to be generated by an AI image tool later, by others (per CLAUDE.md, image generation itself is out of scope for us). For the images to read as one coherent building rather than 13 unrelated renders, the prompts need a shared visual style guide (materials, color palette, massing, ornament placement, mood, rendering medium) repeated/embedded consistently in every individual prompt, plus a scene-specific description grounded in the exact passage of the narrative it illustrates.\n\nWhat: Produce a documented set of detailed image-generation prompts, one per illustration placeholder in docs/counter-proposal.md, each prompt self-contained (includes the full shared style/consistency context, not just a cross-reference) so it can be handed individually to an image generator. Base the visual facts on ref/project-chassis.md (materials strata, CR1 color system executed in plain language, OP2/OP4 ornament) and the relevant narrative passage in docs/counter-proposal.md. Decide file location/format as part of this work.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"Bruno Postle","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-18T20:37:57Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-18T20:47:07Z","started_at":"2026-07-18T20:38:12Z","closed_at":"2026-07-18T20:47:07Z","close_reason":"docs/illustration-prompts.md rewritten: each of the 13 prompts now has the full shared style guide pasted literally inline (no cross-reference placeholder), so any single prompt can be copied straight into an image generator","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-cmo","title":"Decide narrative output format/directory layout, update CLAUDE.md Status","description":"Why: CLAUDE.md's Status section explicitly defers this decision: \"Output format,\nfilenames, and directory layout are not yet finalized - decide and record here once the\nnarrative-writing step actually begins.\" That step is about to begin, so this needs\nresolving before narrative-writing tasks are picked up, otherwise each narrative risks\nlanding in an inconsistent location/format.\n\nWhat: Decide (a) directory - likely a new top-level narratives/ - (b) one file per\nstakeholder vs one combined document, (c) filename convention, (d) whether a short\nshared preamble (chassis summary) is prepended/linked in each narrative file for a\nreader encountering only one of them. Update CLAUDE.md's Status section and Deliverable\nsection to record the decision so future sessions don't have to re-derive it.","acceptance_criteria":"CLAUDE.md Status/Deliverable sections state the concrete directory, filenames and per-file structure to use","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","assignee":"Bruno Postle","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-18T19:38:14Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:38Z","started_at":"2026-07-18T20:00:19Z","closed_at":"2026-07-18T20:03:38Z","close_reason":"brief-condensed.md, critique-failures.md, and CLAUDE.md output-format decision all written","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"ecuador-cmo","depends_on_id":"ecuador-7vi","type":"parent-child","created_at":"2026-07-18T20:47:44Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","metadata":"{}"}],"dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":4,"comment_count":0}
+{"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-gup","title":"Investigate why Salingaros' ChatGPT images read as more compelling than Postle's Midjourney images","description":"Raised while writing the follow-up paper outline (ecuador-lco, paper/outline.md section 4/6/7). Salingaros' ChatGPT-generated images (docs/images-salingaros/) are photo-realistic and, by informal consensus of the authors and July 23 symposium participants, more visually compelling than Postle's Midjourney images (docs/images/), which are looser and watercolour-like. Both tracks used the same pattern subset and form-language grammar as input. Cause is unknown - candidate variables: the generator itself, prompt phrasing differences, how literally each generator resolves the shared form-language vocabulary. Exploratory/optional: a controlled comparison (same narrative text, same style-guide text, run through both generators) would help isolate the variable, if time allows before the paper is finalized.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-24T20:45:51Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-24T20:45:51Z","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
+{"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-0u5","title":"Prototype: bubble diagram / plan-layout generation from pattern subset","description":"Exploratory prototype for a possible plan-layout generation stage, raised while planning the follow-up paper (ecuador-lco). Not committed to the paper yet - the paper's 'next steps' section proposes this only as future work in prose. This issue tracks the separate possibility of actually attempting it, which could get folded into the paper if it happens in time.\n\nMotivation (from ref/youtube-transcript-2026-07-23.txt, ~1:02:40-1:03:36): Salingaros' images are individually beautiful but not mutually consistent - 'these are flavors, not solutions' - because there is no shared floor plan behind them. A practicing architect on the call notes 'this Nikos did not create a plan... we need to give a response to the program and ensure that all the spaces work coordinately.'\n\nIdea: the pattern subset (ref/A Pattern Language Ecuador National Museum.md) and project-chassis.md already encode spatial/adjacency relationships (named circulation realms, collection placement, wings) implicitly, via Alexander patterns that are themselves about spatial relationships (e.g. wings of a building, connected buildings, entrance transitions). Investigate whether an LLM can be prompted to derive an explicit bubble diagram / adjacency layout from the pattern subset + brief, that narratives and illustration prompts could then be grounded in consistently, rather than each narrative/image being generated independently.\n\nScope for this issue: research/prototype only - not a commitment to redo the Ecuador narratives or images around it. Output would likely be a new doc (e.g. ref/plan-layout.md or paper/bubble-diagram-experiment.md) showing whether the approach produces something coherent enough to be worth reporting.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-24T20:34:59Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-24T20:34:59Z","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
 {"_type":"issue","id":"ecuador-e0k","title":"Delete stale ref/ Kimi narrative duplicate","description":"ref/Casa de la Memoria Andina - National Museum Narrative-Kimi.txt is a messier PDF-extraction duplicate of docs/Casa-de-la-Memoria-Andina-National-Museum-Narrative-Kimi.txt (which is the cleaned, canonical copy). Delete the ref/ copy once confirmed nothing else references it.","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"chore","owner":"bruno@postle.net","created_at":"2026-07-24T18:09:17Z","created_by":"Bruno Postle","updated_at":"2026-07-24T18:09:17Z","dependency_count":0,"dependent_count":0,"comment_count":0}
diff --git a/paper/outline.md b/paper/outline.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f1e7dc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/paper/outline.md
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# Outline — Follow-up paper: plan-layout extension of LLM pattern synthesis
+
+Working title: *From Pattern to Plan: Extending LLM-Mediated Pattern
+Language Synthesis with a Form-Language Layer and a Live Public-Advocacy
+Deployment*
+
+Authors: Bruno Postle, Nikos A. Salingaros
+
+Target venue: *Buildings* (sequel to Postle & Salingaros, "LLM and
+Pattern Language Synthesis: A Hybrid Tool for Human-Centered
+Architectural Design," *Buildings* 2025, 15, 2400 —
+`ref/buildings-15-02400-v2.txt`)
+
+Status: outline only, agreed structure, no full prose yet.
+
+## 1. Introduction
+
+Recap the original pattern → narrative → image chain from the 2025
+paper. Frame this paper as reporting a **live, high-stakes
+public-advocacy deployment** — not a hypothetical case study — plus a
+**method extension**: the Ecuador National Museum counter-proposal, an
+independent alternative developed while the winning competition scheme
+is on hold pending public objection.
+
+## 2. Method extension: three inputs instead of two
+
+The original method combined a pattern-language subset with a project
+brief. This project adds a third input, run in parallel with it: a
+**form language**, per Salingaros' "Two Languages for Architecture"
+(`ref/Salingaros-Chapter-11-Two-Languages-for-Architecture.md`) — the
+pattern language governs human/organizational rules, the form language
+governs geometric/tectonic rules (climate response, material,
+color, ornament, historical strata).
+
+Inputs used:
+- Pattern language: `ref/A Pattern Language Ecuador National Museum.md`
+  (55 patterns, curated via APL-Companion)
+- Form language: `ref/Ecuadorian_Form_Language_Grammar.md`
+- Brief/critique: `ref/brief-condensed.md`, `ref/critique-failures.md`
+
+## 3. Templating the form-language step
+
+Salingaros' original form-language grammar was produced by a bespoke,
+non-reusable two-step prompt (`docs/salingaros-form-language-prompt.md`).
+This paper generalizes it into `templates/form-language-prompt-template.md`
+— a single-shot, placeholder-driven instrument (typology / region /
+site-climate / historical strata) that produces a grammar document in
+the same section shape, analogous to how the APL-Companion tool
+generalized pattern-subset curation in the original paper. Reusable on
+future projects outside Ecuador.
+
+## 4. Worked example: two independent runs from shared inputs
+
+Same pattern subset + same form-language grammar, fed into two
+**separate LLM pipelines**, run independently by the two authors, with
+divergent outputs:
+
+- **Postle track**: four stakeholder narratives (visitor, staff, school
+  group, community) → `docs/counter-proposal.md`, illustrated with 13
+  Midjourney images (`docs/images/`).
+- **Salingaros track**: a single merged narrative,
+  `docs/3.Casa-de-la-Memoria-Ecuatoriana-Design-Narrative-Museo-Nacional-del-Ecuador.txt`,
+  illustrated with 25 ChatGPT-generated images (`docs/images-salingaros/`).
+
+Report as a qualitative finding, not a controlled comparison: the two
+image sets differ markedly in register. Salingaros' ChatGPT images read
+as photo-realistic and are, by informal consensus among the authors and
+symposium participants (see §5), the more visually compelling of the
+two; Postle's Midjourney images are looser and more watercolour-like.
+**The cause is not established** — candidate variables include the
+generator itself, prompt phrasing, and how literally each generator
+resolves the same form-language vocabulary — and the paper should
+flag this openly rather than assert an explanation it hasn't tested.
+Given this, **the paper's illustrative material should draw primarily
+on the Salingaros/ChatGPT image set**, using the Postle/Midjourney set
+only for the explicit two-track comparison in this section, not as the
+paper's default visual register elsewhere.
+
+## 5. Reception
+
+The July 23 symposium (`ref/youtube-transcript-2026-07-23.txt`) as
+informal peer engagement, on the record:
+- Praise for aesthetic consistency of "spirit" across the (Salingaros)
+  images, without demanding pixel-identical repetition (~l.1295–1304).
+- Substantive critique from a practicing architect (Pablo Álvarez
+  Funes): "this Nikos did not create a plan" (l.1475); "these are
+  images, these are flavors, these are not solutions" (l.1499);
+  hallucinations visible on close inspection of corners (l.1496); need
+  for licensed architects to turn the images into buildable floor
+  plans, elevations, sections, and MEP/structural coordination
+  (l.1214, l.1484).
+
+## 6. Drawbacks
+
+- Images are inspirational/illustrative, not derived from one
+  coordinated floor plan — spatial claims across images aren't
+  guaranteed to reconcile. Concrete instance from this repo: the
+  entrance-portal image shows three arches against a five-bay text
+  description; resolved by loosening the image caption rather than
+  rewriting the design narrative (the narrative is the design intent
+  of record).
+- No mechanism yet for genuine public participation beyond unfiltered
+  social-media image voting, which the transcript participants warn
+  degenerates without curation.
+- Open, unexplained variable: why one generator's output reads as more
+  architecturally credible than the other's for the same inputs (§4) —
+  noted as a limitation of the method's current image stage, not
+  resolved here.
+
+## 7. Next steps
+
+Propose (not prototype, per author decision) plan-layout generation as
+a missing stage: mining the pattern subset's implicit spatial/adjacency
+relationships (e.g. `project-chassis.md`'s named circulation realms)
+into an explicit layout layer that narratives and images could be
+derived *from*, rather than each being independently invented — directly
+answering the "this did not create a plan" critique in §5. See
+`ecuador-0u5` for an exploratory prototype that may or may not land in
+time to fold into this section.
+
+Secondary open question, lower priority: whether the image-register gap
+observed in §4 is attributable to the generator, the prompt, or
+something else — worth a controlled comparison (same narrative, same
+style-guide text, both generators) if time allows, but not required for
+this paper's core claims.
+
+## 8. Conclusion