Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude
055d7101cd
ssz: crinkliness is declared per space; there is no daylight attribute
Owner's ruling, and it corrects the design not just the classification: the
daylight requirement is already defined in the crinkliness. The gaussian's
compact side IS "too little exposed wall per unit floor"; its exposed side
is envelope cost. 38.9's proposed daylight: axis was redundant, and keying
it off usage: was worse than redundant.

What was actually missing: crinkliness is the only leaf quality factor with
no per-space target. size, width and proportion are all declared by the
space; crinkliness was one global number for every room in every building.

  crinkliness: none        -> no minimum-exposure requirement, may be buried
  crinkliness: [t, s]      -> this space's own target
  key absent               -> the global uncrinkliness target, as today

`none` clips the factor on the compact side, it does not switch it off:
over-exposure is still penalised, because a crinkly leaf costs envelope
whatever it holds. A store may be buried; a store may not be a starfish.

The mechanism is backward compatible -- an absent key resolves to the
global target, so shipping it changes no score. Behaviour changes only
where a config declares something, which keeps the objective change
visible per programme in config rather than hidden in a default.

Owner's classification: everything a person occupies wants a window, WCs
and reception/waiting/foyer included; only stores, plant, records and
laundry do not. migrate_crinkliness_key.py declared crinkliness: none on 18
corpus spaces. Crinkliness fails 271 -> 243, of which not-defects 136 (50%)
-> 108 (44%); the 28 that went are exactly the utility fails.

usage_daylight and needs_daylight are removed as mis-keyed, and
DAYLIGHT_USAGES with them -- a vocabulary value should exist only where the
engine treats it differently. The historical crinkliness_mode modes stay,
default off, so 38.6/38.8 remain reproducible.

uncrinkliness_circulation is now settable to none like any space, but its
default is left unchanged pending a ruling: corridors were not among the
groups ruled on and are 63% of the remaining phantom fails.

Lint at parity (46); tests 364 passed, same 7 pre-existing fixture failures.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB
2026-08-28 22:39:09 +00:00
Claude
03aadec1ba
§39.7: access requirements become a declared usage: attribute (homemaker-py-sel)
Closes the second namespace sharing a first character with programme codes: the
usage prefixes b/t/l/k, under which a room silently inherited another room's
connectivity rules from its spelling.

usage is a plain, MANDATORY attribute of the space definition -- not a lookup
table. An interim design proposed a top-level usage_classes: table binding
author-coined names to behaviour; withdrawn, because an indirect name->behaviour
mapping living apart from the thing it describes is exactly the shape of the
prefix rule §39 exists to remove, it would be the only such table in a schema
where every other space property is a plain attribute, and the need it served
was already met -- "building specific" is about what a room is CALLED, and
name: is already free text.

Rule that settles it: a usage value exists iff the engine treats it differently
somewhere. Config selects among behaviours; it cannot invent them.

- programme.USAGES (living/kitchen/bedroom/toilet/utility/none) plus the
  behaviour groupings PRIVATE_USAGES / PRIVATE_STRIPS / TOILET_STRIPS /
  SOCIABLE_USAGES. Missing or unknown usage is a load error naming the code,
  from BOTH parse paths.
- Code-level, never leaf-level: usage_of(leaf.type) is looked up fresh, so a
  retype changes the class automatically. 51 sites assign leaf.type, and
  share/share_type plus the r5a resurrection are the precedent for why
  leaf-level attributes rot.
- graph.has_circulation takes the usage map and trims on declared class;
  fitness.access and the public-access check likewise. fitness._t0 is DELETED --
  no first-character type test remains anywhere in the codebase.
- utility is distinct from bedroom (same access requirements today) because it
  is a different use and gives derive_interchange_classes an axis to relax on.
- A toilet now keeps its edge to a terminal room -- the Brand adjacency, which
  the old b-before-t loop ordering severed.
- All 107 corpus entries migrated by experiments/migrate_usage_key.py, comments
  and layout preserved.

MEASURED -- the connectivity model was ~4x too permissive. `none` is not
neutral: nothing is trimmed, so the graph may route THROUGH the room, and 34 of
52 codes had no class (Dental Surgery, Records Room, Utilities Closet all served
as corridors). Edges trimmed, prefix-inferred vs declared, 3 seeds each:
  harbor-house   18 (9%)  -> 79 (39%)   inaccessible fails 0 -> 4
  health-centre  12 (8%)  -> 59 (40%)   inaccessible fails 2 -> 3
  maple-court    53 (17%) -> 123 (39%)  inaccessible fails 1 -> 5

Re-baseline (seed 1, 20k, harbor): 58 fails (15h/43s) -> 61 (16h/45s), now
reporting 1-inaccessible-usable-space x2 plus level 0 and level 1 not connected.
The count rose because the objective got honest -- those failures were always
true of the layout and the old model could not see them. Every harbor number
before this was measured against a graph crediting routes through store
cupboards.

Sharpens §38.2: the objective pays x60-85 to delete circulation, and until now
the deleted corridors were not missed because storage stood in for them. With
that substitution gone, homemaker-py-2v1 is the remaining half -- and now
measurable, because the fails it should prevent actually fire.

350 passed (+5 new), same 7 pre-existing fixture failures, lint unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB
2026-08-26 13:39:41 +00:00
995342d0a4 Phase 7 §12.2: proportion-aware constructive seeding + storey_minimum fix (leu.2, cq1)
Size each constructive-seed cut from leaf TARGET areas (division=[f,f] gives
left area-fraction f) and pick each cut's rotation for child squareness — both
derived from target dims, topology/type assignment untouched. Area-only
regressed (slivers); rotation choice is what makes it pay.

End-to-end (20000 evals, 3 seeds, staged): harbor 85.3->74.0 (-13%, best 69),
maple-court 151.7->136.0 (-10%, best 126). PROP=0 reproduces the §11.7/§12.1
baselines exactly. programme-house regresses at fixed budget (deeper local
optimum walls off the undivide restructuring path) but a budget sweep shows
it's convergence speed, not a worse asymptote (PROP=1 reaches 1 fail at 150k).
Default-on (seed_proportion_aware=True, env PROP=1).

cq1: n_storeys now honours storey_minimum, not just level: keys — programme-house
(storey_minimum:2, all rooms level:0) was seeded one storey short and fell
through to plain search. New programme.storey_minimum()/n_storeys_for();
driver.search passes min_storeys to the seeder; search_staged routes on the max.
No-op for harbor/maple; programme-house single-stage 8.0->5.0.

New maple-court best (126) saved as generated.dom. 204 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 14:04:42 +01:00
7d7994e7a3 Phase 7 §12.1: larger-than-house benchmark maple-court + baseline (leu.1)
26 programme entries / 52 rooms / 3 storeys (~1015 m2 internal). Mirrors
harbor's adjacency-to-c load + secondary adjacencies; room codes avoid the
generic c/o/s leading-letter trap. Staged adjacency-aware baseline (20000
evals, URB_NO_OCCLUSION=1): 145/158/152 fails, mean 151.7; all native
re-score OK. Best (145) saved as generated.dom. Recorded in DESIGN.md §12.1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-19 14:00:21 +01:00