Add objective="quality"|"threshold" to collapse_global and make threshold
the finish-time default. The continuous-quality objective maximises
sum(usage_quality*area), which can trade one leaf just over the 0.1 fail
threshold for another just under (a fail SHUFFLE). The threshold objective
maximises the COUNT of passing size/width/proportion factors directly, with
continuous fit only as a tiebreak. A satisfied adjacency and a passing factor
share one weight (_COLLAPSE_FAIL_W) so both fail classes are minimised jointly.
Sweep over 6 harbor-house evolved layouts (total fails, base 195):
adj_off/quality 192 adj_on/quality 185 adj_off/thresh 181 adj_on/thresh 172
adj_on/threshold is monotone across all 6 (never worse than baseline), so it
is the new default. Residual on the best layout (15→13) is the building-level
"no outside public access" constraint, outside the per-leaf model.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Global relabel of inside-room leaves via one optimal assignment over the
full leaf set — the 9o5 per-class collapse generalised to N leaves ↔ M
required rooms — as a one-shot finish-time polish on a committed layout.
Assignable room_codes exclude any starting c/o/s to match the scorer's
own partition (check_space_counts skips those; cr1/st1/st2 collide with
the circulation/structure convention). Hard level constraint via a -1e12
forbid penalty. Adjacency handled as an iterated relaxation: geometry is
fixed at finish time so each leaf's graph neighbours are fixed; warm-start
from evolved labels, each pass a linear assignment over quality + an
adjacency bonus (has_adjacency vs current labels), Jacobi to a fixpoint.
Measured (level+adjacency): best evolved layout 15→14 fails, rougher ones
32→28 and 90→83; adjacency-on beats adjacency-off everywhere (off regresses
the best layout +1). Substrate only — not wired into search or a CLI yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
9o5 §7.5 escape hatch: a per-space `interchange: false` opt-out in
patterns.config removes a code from auto-derived interchange classes,
letting the architect veto a harmful grouping (harbor-house's transitive
8-code chain) without disabling superposition globally.
SpaceReq gains an `interchange` bool (default True). Honoured as an S0
short-circuit in interchangeable() and by filtering derive_interchange_
classes() input. Superpose default stays OFF regardless (xi7 verdict), so
this only bites when superposition is enabled on a real config.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
harbor-house 3M (500k/grain x3 + 1.5M polish, workers 4, ~22h): the in-run
grain anneal reached 1.26e-08 / 23 fails (canonical byte-for-byte), losing
decisively to both the direct --no-leaf-sharing baseline (5.14e-06 / 15) and
yaa's single-hard-transition warm chain (4.19e-06 / 15) — ~400x worse fitness,
+8 fails.
Each grain step spikes the fail count as its unfolded leaves acquire
independent shape fails (phase-end 19->21->27, final de-share 27->36); the
per-phase budget re-polishes a partially-materialised state the next step
materialises further, so coarse-grain gains do not carry forward. The polish
phase started from a deeper hole (36) than the warm chain's single clean
transition and 1.5M evals recovered only to 23. The sharing-phase topology
skeleton is best cashed in once, at full grain — not annealed.
Machinery retained (search_annealed, --anneal-grain, unfold above=, seed_pop,
max_share override): correct, tested, honest, reusable. Default finish stays
§15's single-transition unfold+polish. DESIGN §16 records the verdict; closes
homemaker-py-kpu.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Ramp the leaf-share grain down within one continuous run (e.g. 4->3->2->off),
carrying the whole population across each step — graduated non-convexity over
the single hard sharing->off transition of the §15 finish.
- operators.unfold_shared_leaves(above=cap): unfold only leaves whose share
exceeds the new grain cap, leaving smaller-share leaves collapsed for the
next step. above=1 (default) keeps the full-unfold §15 behaviour.
- driver: max_share override threaded through _overrides_for/_fitness_for/
_evaluate so a phase can rebuild the evaluator at a lower leaf_share_max cap;
search(seed_pop=) evaluates an explicit initial population so a phase hands
its whole population to the next instead of restarting from a single best.
- driver.search_annealed: one phase per descending grain then a de-share
polish; unfold-above-cap between steps; cumulative accounting + grain-tagged
history; honest canonical best (byte-for-byte verified vs homemaker-fitness).
- evolve: --anneal-grain LADDER CLI (self-finishing; §15 finish not applied).
8iv settled the primitive (grid unfold beat the circulation-aware slice), so
the ramp reuses the plain balanced-grid unfold at every step.
Tests: unfold above-cap selectivity, seed_pop seeding, search_annealed phase
stitching / honest finish / degenerate-ladder fallback. 258 pass. DESIGN §16.
Head-to-head A/B on harbor-house still to run; verdict pending (issue open).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Investigated homemaker-py-8iv (route access to unfolded shared-leaf children).
Built + A/B-tested circulation-aware slicing vs the existing balanced grid; the
150k-eval warm-start polish shows slice loses decisively (41 fails/3.5e-14 vs
grid 25 fails/2.4e-09, grid ahead at every milestone). Reverted the code to the
grid unfold; closed 8iv negative and corrected kpu (Schedule B) to use the grid
unfold, not slicing. Also closed yaa (investigation complete).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Add DESIGN.md §15 recording the leaf-sharing output-honesty bug (internal
sharing objective diverges from canonical scorer), yaa's conclusive
unfold-then-polish investigation, and the driver.polish_finish auto-finish
fix + --polish-budget CLI knob. Matches §13.10's documentation of the
original leaf-sharing feature.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Leaf-sharing evolve runs optimised a sharing-credited objective (a shared
leaf of code X with share=k counts as k programme rooms, size re-centred on
k*target) but wrote the un-materialised genome, which the canonical
homemaker-fitness rates catastrophically worse (harbor-house: internal
1.03e-05 vs canonical 6.73e-29, 15 critical missing-room fails).
Fix: before write, driver.polish_finish() unfolds every live shared leaf
into k distinct rooms (operators.unfold_shared_leaves — pays down the count
deficit) then warm-starts a leaf_sharing=False polish search from the
unfolded genome so the materialised rooms get proportion/width/size cleanup.
Returned best.fitness is the canonical score (leaf_sharing off => internal
== canonical). This is yaa's proven unfold-then-polish path, made automatic.
evolve.py: new --polish-budget (env HOMEMAKER_POLISH_BUDGET; -1=auto=
budget//2, 0=unfold+rescore only). Interrupt forces polish_budget=0 for a
fast honest output. Default stays --leaf-sharing on (its topology-search
speed retained; output made honest by the finish). Schedule B in-run
annealing remains homemaker-py-kpu.
Verified (harbor-house 3000+1500): reported polish fitness 4.79788e-27
matches canonical homemaker-fitness exactly, 0 critical fails. Tests: 254
pass (+3 polish_finish).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
operators.unfold_shared_leaves(): materialise each live shared leaf
(share=k) into k distinct same-code sibling leaves, splitting its
footprint into k equal-target children with squarest per-cut rotation
(_size_subtree_equal), clearing the share stamp. Surgical — siblings'
evolved geometry is untouched.
Investigation result (harbor-house, evolved-3M sharing seed):
- unfold alone (zero search) closes all 15 critical missing-room fails
and lifts the canonical score 6.73e-29 -> 1.46e-19 (90->59 fails).
- warm-starting a --no-leaf-sharing evolve from the unfolded seed runs
~7-8 orders of magnitude ahead of the naive (un-materialised) warm
start at equal budget. The count deficit, not the sizing, was what
stranded Schedule A deep in the fail hole.
Adds test_unfold_shared_leaves_materialises_deficit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Ran harbor-house init.dom under 3M-eval memetic search. Default --leaf-sharing
scored 6.7e-29 (90 fails, 15 missing rooms) when re-scored by canonical
homemaker-fitness, vs 5.14e-06 (15 fails, 0 critical) for the honest
--no-leaf-sharing warm-start chain. Head-to-head confirmed a naive
sharing->no-sharing warm-start plateaus ~60x behind, motivating programmatic
unfold of shared leaves at the phase transition (yaa).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
A/B at equal budget (collapsed score): --superpose vs --no-superpose.
- programme-house (budget 3000, seeds 1-5): OFF wins 4/5
- harbor-house (budget 2500, seeds 1-3): OFF wins 2/3
Relaxation gap (§7.4) small (ratio 1.01-1.23); per-eval collapse removes it
by construction, so the failure mode is geometry-floor dominance, not the gap.
harbor-house 8-code chain misgroups and adds fails -> filed b3v (interchange:false).
Verdict: keep --superpose default OFF.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M8566xAxTnwtJTkpXjYNZm
Interchangeable codes (similar size/width/proportion, compatible level/stack,
no adjacency edge) form equivalence classes derived from the programme. With
--superpose (default off), each fitness eval COLLAPSES every superposed leaf to
its best in-class usage via an optimal supply->demand assignment (brute force
<=C! within cap C=4, scipy Hungarian beyond), then scores the condensed types.
Because collapse re-types on the unmerged tree before all checks, counts /
adjacency / quality are unchanged downstream -- no Node field, no graph/operator
changes -- and default OFF is bit-identical.
- programme.py: derive_interchange_classes + interchangeable (S1-S4, locked
thresholds R_SIZE=1.5/R_WIDTH=1.3/R_PROP=1.5, CLASS_CAP=4)
- fitness.py: collapse_superposition, _best_assignment, _usage_quality;
superpose/superpose_class_cap conf knobs; collapse hooked into _evaluate_full
- driver.py/evolve.py: superpose flag plumbed beside leaf_sharing; --superpose
- tests/test_superposition.py: 17 tests (derivation, assignment, end-to-end)
Closes homemaker-py-9o5 (build); validation A/B is homemaker-py-xi7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
R_size=1.5 / R_width=1.3 / R_prop=1.5 for the interchangeable-class similarity
gate (S2); class-size cap C=4 confirmed; interchange:false veto hatch deferred
to a later fix only if auto-derivation misgroups on real configs. All open
questions resolved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Resolve open Q1: collapse runs per fitness eval (search optimises the
condensed objective directly, removing the relaxation gap), bounded by a
derivation-time class-size cap C=4 (<=24 perms/eval). Note the collapse is a
separable linear-sum assignment, so Hungarian solves it exactly beyond the
cap if a real class ever exceeds it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Spec the multi-use-leaves feature per Bruno's framing: superposition as a
search relaxation over auto-derived interchangeable equivalence classes
(requirement-similarity), condensed to specific usage at the end by
brute-forcing the in-class assignment (3 usages/3 leaves = 6 perms). Records
the reversal of the issue's 'path b preferred' note, the relaxation-gap /
0-3 search-easing prior, default-OFF baseline gate, and open Qs (collapse
cadence, similarity thresholds, veto hatch).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Prime a population from N independent converged elites + crossover-heavy
migration phase, vs best-of-N at equal total budget. Island does NOT win:
harbor 68 vs control 67 (within parallel noise), maple 124 vs control 116
(decisive). Default-off child_probe hook on driver.search instruments the
deciding mechanism: area-matched crossover across independently-converged
elites rarely synthesizes (1/65 harbor, 3/63 maple beat the better parent,
max fail-drop 2-5), confirming the alignment hypothesis (non-canonical 9gp
encoding -> disruptive splice). Search-machinery null #3; residual stays
geometry/shape-bound. 233 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
§13.8 verdict was positive and monotone-harmless, so default the share-aware
edge-too-long cap to leaf_sharing when share_edge_cap is unset — mirrors the
pll bal+share and §13.6 interior_outside default flips. Explicit
share_edge_cap=False still reproduces the pre-flip control arm.
- fitness.Fitness.__init__: cap defaults to self._leaf_sharing when the conf
key is unset (None); explicit True/False honoured.
- run_staged_search.py: pin conf["share_edge_cap"] = share_edge in both A/B
arms so SHAREEDGE=0 stays a clean control post-flip.
- tests: control arm now pins share_edge_cap=False; new
test_edge_cap_defaults_on_under_leaf_sharing guards the flip.
- DESIGN.md §13.9: rebaseline §13.x floor (maple 80.3→74.0, harbor 34.7→31.0).
Non-sharing runs untouched: programme-house control re-score reproduces
bit-for-bit. 222 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
§13.7 flagged edge-too-long as harbor's top fail class. Dissection showed the
bulk are a leaf-sharing REPRESENTATION ARTIFACT: a share=k leaf aggregates k
same-code rooms, so its walls run ~k× the flat 8 m cap purely for being big —
the same §13.3 leak (size/missing relaxed for shared leaves) on the wall measure,
since edge_cost/outside_edge_cost ignored leaf.share.
Fix: Fitness._edge_cap(*leaves) scales the 8 m cap by the largest type-guarded
leaf_share among adjoining leaves, mirroring quality_size's k×target; non-shared
leaves keep the flat cap so genuine narrow/oversize pathologies stay flagged.
Gated behind a share_edge_cap config knob (SHAREEDGE env), default OFF so the
§13.x controls reproduce.
A/B (full Phase-8 stack, staged, 20k evals, seeds 0/1/2): control reproduces
§13.7 (maple 80.3 exact, harbor 34.7≈34.0); share-aware arm maple 80.3→74.0
(−7.9%), harbor 34.7→31.0 (−10.6%), zero regressions across 6 seeds. Positive
and monotone-harmless (only ever removes a false-positive fail). Verdict:
recommend default-ON; follow-up issue flips the default + rebaselines the floor.
Tests: 6 new unit tests for _edge_cap (221 pass).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JygRv4n2dcyDQqMiDRe7TN
experiments/diag_edge_too_long.py: the 6 harbor edge-too-long fails are 2
locations — a share=3 combined leaf (247 m², aspect 1.2; flat 8 m cap not
share-aware, unlike quality_size's k×target) accounting for ~4, and one
1.2×16.7 m narrow sliver (~2, also caught by width/proportion). No corridors.
Files homemaker-py-hph (share-aware edge-too-long fix).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JygRv4n2dcyDQqMiDRe7TN
500k serial full-stack harbor probe (probe_harbor_floor.py): 20 fails,
crinkliness 13→4, landlocked crinkliness ~13→2 of 20. Interior-O (default-ON,
erc.8) is 71d's named fix and dissolved its landlocked-crinkliness target;
residual now diffuse (top class edge-too-long). NO-GO on 71d.
Cumulative Phase-8 floor vs §12.2 baseline (leaf-share-relaxed): maple
136.0→80.3 (−41%), harbor 74.0→34.0 (−54%) — all from construction levers,
none from search machinery, per the epic thesis.
Closes erc epic: 71d/7u5/jrb/u8x superseded-by-construction; erc.5/erc.6
wont-fix (Diag A/B revisit conditions unmet). DESIGN §13.7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JygRv4n2dcyDQqMiDRe7TN
§13.6/ld2 verdict: interior-O light-well seeding is net-positive — harbor
-16.4% (all seeds improve), maple net-neutral (-2.8% mean, no programme
regresses). Mirror the pll bal+share flip: default interior_outside
False->True in driver.search/search_staged and operators.constructive_topology/
lift_base_to_storeys (outside_divisor stays 3). The experiments INTERIORO
A/B override is unchanged. test_interior_outside_… now pins the peripheral
baseline to interior_outside=False explicitly. 215 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Seed O as interior light wells (most-landlocked leaves first, count scaled
by room count via outside_divisor) instead of one peripheral O, attacking the
erc crinkliness residual: seed diagnostic confirms every crinkliness fail is
under-exposed (landlocked), none over-exposed.
A/B (20k evals, seeds 0/1/2, bal+share stack, §13.6): control reproduces §13.5;
interior odiv=3 gives harbor -16.4% (all seeds improve) and maple -2.8%
(net-neutral). Default-optimal divisor 3 found by seed sweep (6 was null).
Lever default OFF; default-ON flip tracked as erc.8.
- operators: interior_outside + outside_divisor through constructive_topology,
lift_base_to_storeys, _assign_adjacency_aware (fix n_circ budget for >1 O)
- driver.search/search_staged threading; run_staged_search.py INTERIORO/ODIV env
- test_interior_outside_seeds_landlocked_wells_and_scales_count
- experiments/run_interioro_ab.sh; DESIGN.md §13.6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
erc.7/§13.5 verdict: depth_balanced + leaf_sharing (factor 3) is the
winning Phase-8 stack. Flip the three knobs to default-on so
homemaker-evolve inherits them; env-var A/B overrides (DEPTHBAL/
LEAFSHARE/LEAFSHAREFAC) unchanged. 214 tests pass, no snapshot churn.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
End-to-end 20k A/B (seeds 0/1/2): depth-balancing gives −5.8% maple / −3.2%
harbor with OVERLAPPING arms — far less than the −11/−12% seed-floor probe,
because the 20k search erodes most of the seed advantage via divide/undivide
mutations (unlike leaf-sharing's structural leaf-count cut, which the search
cannot undo). Baseline reproduces §12.2 (maple 137.0 vs 136.0, harbor 74.0).
Promise is the additive floor with leaf-sharing (probe: bal+sh3 << share3-alone);
the decisive test is erc.7 synergy. Keep depth_balanced default OFF; close erc.4,
advance erc.7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_grow_leaves grew a random caterpillar, so equal-target rooms landed at
wildly different binary-tree depths — the depth-driven size maldistribution
Diagnostic B (§13.2) localized (same code at 0.05x and 14.7x target). The
depth_balanced flag always splits a shallowest leaf instead, growing a
near-complete tree so the proportion-aware sizing pass hits each target with
cut fractions near their proportional value.
Floor probe (diag_depth_balance.py): depth spread collapses 7->1, the giant
ratio falls (maxR 12->8 harbor / 16->6 maple), %undersize 54->25 / 42->22,
and the achievable floor drops -12% harbor / -11% maple at EQUAL leaf count.
Additive with leaf-sharing (bal+sh3 beats §13.3 share3-alone). Default OFF,
214 tests pass; threaded through driver.search/search_staged and exposed via
DEPTHBAL in run_staged_search.py. End-to-end 20k A/B running.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Same-code rooms collapse into fewer, larger SHARED leaves so the ~1.8/leaf
shape tax (§13.1) is paid once per group. Multiplicity k is recovered from
area (k=clamp(round(area/target),1,max_share)) — no genome change — and used
in two default-OFF sites: graph.check_space_counts counts coverage (Σk vs
req.count) so one leaf covers several rooms without a missing fail, and
fitness.quality_size centres on k×target (σ scaled by k). Construction:
operators._share_rooms groups instances; _size_divisions_from_targets sizes
shared leaves to k×target via leaf_mult.
Floor probe (experiments/diag_leaf_sharing.py, harbor+maple, seeds 0/1/2,
+innerloop): total fails −27% harbor / −16% maple at share3, shape factors
fall ~linearly with leaf count (confirms §13.1). Cap: 17–44 missing fails
leak because depth maldistribution (§13.2) keeps shared leaves below k×target
so round() undercounts; inner loop can't close it. Net still positive.
Default-OFF reproduces baseline exactly (214 tests pass). Driver plumbing +
staged 20k A/B remain; §13.3 records the next design fork.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
