Python rewrite of the Urb/Homemaker stack
Find a file
Claude 50fb293fa5
Re-verify 1ph: the iio bug could never have touched it
d86 asked for the rigorous version of 35's spot-check -- check out the
codebase at the 1ph commit, backport the iio stale-leaf-share fix, re-run
the historical seed sets.

One constraint had to be worked around: this repository's history begins
2026-07-30, six days AFTER the 1ph commit (2026-07-24), so that checkout
does not exist here. Closest reachable stand-in is 391f510 (2026-07-30), a
genuine ancestor of the iio fix and therefore pre-iio, carrying that era's
examples/ and objective. Measured there, not at the true 1ph commit, and
that is a real limitation of the reproduction.

Protocol as published: programme-house, budget 3000, 4 workers, seeds 1-20,
ON vs OFF, both arms finished with --collapse. Run twice over one worktree,
as-is then with the 22-line iio hunk applied.

                            OFF    ON     W/L/T    mean diff  t(df=19)
  published 1ph             7.95   7.10   11/6/3   +0.85      2.38
  pre-iio 391f510           8.05   7.10   11/6/3   +0.95      2.59
  same + iio fix            8.05   7.10   11/6/3   +0.95      2.59

The published verdict reproduces, and the iio fix changes nothing: 0 of 40
(seed, arm) cells differ, per-seed counts equal cell by cell.

It could not have been otherwise. The bug needs a leaf carrying a STALE
share/share_type, and leaf-sharing only stamps a share where a code has
count > 1 -- programme-house declares count: 1 for all six codes. Over 8
constructed seeds at that commit, programme-house had share_type set on 0
of 56 leaves; harbor-house on 24 of 128. _collapse_value reads
leaf.share_type, so the bug is structurally unreachable on the 1ph
protocol. That is why 35 saw 2/3 harbor seeds diverge by 5-8 fails while
programme-house at N=20 moves not one cell: harbor has codes at counts 10,
6 and 5.

20's retroactive caveat is discharged for the 1ph section and stays live
for harbor-house/qpk, where shares exist and divergence was measured.

Kept experiments/rerun_1ph_protocol.sh and both result TSVs.

Closes homemaker-py-d86.

Lint at parity (46); tests 384 passed, 0 failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB
2026-08-29 13:21:29 +00:00
.beads Re-verify 1ph: the iio bug could never have touched it 2026-08-29 13:21:29 +00:00
.claude Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00
examples Declare toilet-to-sleeping adjacency where the brief supports it 2026-08-29 10:57:44 +00:00
experiments Re-verify 1ph: the iio bug could never have touched it 2026-08-29 13:21:29 +00:00
src/homemaker_layout n_workers is an algorithm parameter, not noise 2026-08-29 12:52:33 +00:00
tests n_workers is an algorithm parameter, not noise 2026-08-29 12:52:33 +00:00
.gitignore bd init: initialize beads issue tracking 2026-06-11 23:27:11 +01:00
AGENTS.md §39.7: access requirements become a declared usage: attribute (homemaker-py-sel) 2026-08-26 13:39:41 +00:00
CLAUDE.md §39.7: access requirements become a declared usage: attribute (homemaker-py-sel) 2026-08-26 13:39:41 +00:00
DESIGN.md Re-verify 1ph: the iio bug could never have touched it 2026-08-29 13:21:29 +00:00
pyproject.toml homemaker-py-2g7.5: CP-SAT exact room-code assignment (seeder + reassign op) 2026-08-04 09:19:36 +01:00
README.md §39.7: access requirements become a declared usage: attribute (homemaker-py-sel) 2026-08-26 13:39:41 +00:00

homemaker-layout

Programme-driven building-layout search over slicing trees. A clean-room Python successor to the Perl Urb project, intended to eventually be 100% Python.

Why a rewrite

Urb represents a building as a binary slicing tree where room sizes are derived top-down from division ratios. That makes room area an emergent property of every cut above it, which:

  • gives the genome low locality (a cut near the root rescales every descendant),
  • makes target room sizes nearly impossible to hit, so the gaussian size penalty dominates fitness, and
  • defeats crossover (transplanted subtrees lose their proportions).

homemaker inverts this: leaves carry target dimensions from the programme and division ratios are solved bottom-up for a fixed topology. The evolutionary search then only explores topology + types + adjacency.

Phase plan

  1. Solver experiment: port Urb's geometry, re-solve ratios from programme targets, score the result against the original via the Perl oracle.
  2. Native Python fitness (retire the Perl oracle).
  3. Memetic search: canonical slicing genome + high-locality operators + Nelder-Mead inner loop.
  4. Penalty reshaping: lexicographic (-n_fails, fitness) outer-search comparison.
  5. Representation upgrade: canonical slicing encoding + bottom-up shape feasibility, scaled to larger programmes.
  6. Search-quality experiments (current): a long running series of opt-in levers tried against the harbor-house, health-centre, and programme-house example corpora — leaf-sharing, finish-time cell→room collapse, ruin-and-recreate LNS, 2-opt polish, multi-use/co-located leaves, adjacency-graph and bubble-diagram fitness signals, and more. Most of these are negative/null results kept as opt-in flags or reference code rather than defaults. See DESIGN.md §11 onward for the full, numbered experiment log with methodology and results for each.

Layout

  • src/homemaker_layout/dom.py — read/write Urb .dom YAML into a Node tree.
  • src/homemaker_layout/geometry.py — faithful port of Urb's top-down geometry.
  • src/homemaker_layout/programme.py — parse patterns.config space requirements.
  • src/homemaker_layout/solver.py — bottom-up ratio solve (scipy).
  • src/homemaker_layout/fitness.py — native Python fitness evaluator.
  • src/homemaker_layout/fitness_cmd.pyhomemaker-fitness CLI (drop-in for urb-fitness.pl).
  • src/homemaker_layout/collapse_cmd.pyhomemaker-collapse CLI: finish-time global cell→room relabel of a .dom.
  • src/homemaker_layout/graph.py — leaf-adjacency graph for programme-driven checks.
  • src/homemaker_layout/genome.py — topology genome: base-floor tree + per-storey deltas.
  • src/homemaker_layout/operators.py — high-locality mutation and subtree crossover.
  • src/homemaker_layout/innerloop.py — ratio optimisation inner loop (Nelder-Mead / CMA-ES).
  • src/homemaker_layout/driver.py — memetic search outer loop.
  • src/homemaker_layout/evolve.pyhomemaker-evolve CLI entry point.
  • src/homemaker_layout/oracle.py — legacy Perl shim, kept for cross-validation only.
  • src/homemaker_layout/bubble.py — 3D bubble-diagram adjacency fitness-signal prototype (DESIGN.md §27); validated null, not wired into fitness.py — reference only.

Room codes and reserved names

Leaf types live in three namespaces that share a first character. Only the first is enforced; the other two are conventions the fitness function reads, so a room's spelling can change how it is scored.

1. Generic structural types — C, O, S (reserved). The leaves the search itself creates: C circulation, O outside, S sahn (an outside court that also serves as circulation). Always uppercase. A programme code spelled exactly C, O or S is rejected at load.

2. Programme room codes — anything else, lowercase. k1, b1, cr1, of, and single-character codes like r or t. These may start with any letter: since DESIGN.md §39.4 the generic tests match C/O/S exactly, so naming a room cr1 no longer makes it circulation. (Before that fix it did — and silently dropped it from the required-space check entirely.)

3. Access requirements — the usage: attribute. Every space declares one of living, kitchen, bedroom, toilet, utility, none. Mandatory, no fallback, and a missing or unknown value is a load error. It replaced a first-character convention (b/t/l/k) under which a room silently inherited another room's connectivity rules from its spelling — la1 "Laundry Room" was trimmed as a living room (DESIGN.md §39.7).

spaces:
  la1:
    usage: utility          # controlled, drives engine behaviour
    name: Laundry Room      # free text, building-specific

A usage value exists only where the engine treats it differently, so the vocabulary is closed: a new access class means new code, not new config. Check a programme with:

python experiments/audit_programme_config.py

which reports reserved-name collisions, the usage class each code picks up, and whether each room's size/width/proportion/crinkliness targets are mutually satisfiable at all.