Python rewrite of the Urb/Homemaker stack
Bruno Postle
6ed9e0b4b1
Search the genome in causal dependency order. Stage 1 evolves a single-storey
base over the level-0 room set (programme auto-derived to a tempdir), ranked
with a substrate-readiness bonus (reserved core × divisible capacity) so the
base is selected as a good substrate, not just a good ground floor (anti-§4.2).
Stage 2 lifts the best base into a full multi-storey design — preserving the
inherited core, instantiating each upper storey's required set by construction —
and searches the deltas with the base mutable at low probability (base_p=0.15).
New: programme.{n_storeys_required,partition_rooms_by_storey,write_stage1_programme},
graph.substrate_readiness, operators.{lift_base_to_storeys,_pick_weighted_by_storey},
base_p threading, driver.search rank_bonus_fn/seed_factory/base_p hooks +
search_staged orchestrator, experiments/run_staged_search.py, tests/test_staging.py.
Result (harbor, 20000 evals, seed 0): staged 95 fails vs single-stage 105
(-10, -9.5%), gain in crinkliness 27->18 + edge 12->8. Anti-bungalow confirmed
(Stage-2 core moves all noop — core inherited, not carved). Programme-house
regression PASS (warmstart-2f4 still reaches whole-pop 1-fail).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .beads | ||
| .claude | ||
| examples | ||
| experiments | ||
| src/homemaker_layout | ||
| tests | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| DESIGN.md | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
homemaker-layout
Programme-driven building-layout search over slicing trees. A clean-room Python successor to the Perl Urb project, intended to eventually be 100% Python.
Why a rewrite
Urb represents a building as a binary slicing tree where room sizes are derived top-down from division ratios. That makes room area an emergent property of every cut above it, which:
- gives the genome low locality (a cut near the root rescales every descendant),
- makes target room sizes nearly impossible to hit, so the gaussian size penalty dominates fitness, and
- defeats crossover (transplanted subtrees lose their proportions).
homemaker inverts this: leaves carry target dimensions from the programme and division ratios are solved bottom-up for a fixed topology. The evolutionary search then only explores topology + types + adjacency.
Phase plan
Solver experiment: port Urb's geometry, re-solve ratios from programme targets, score the result against the original via the Perl oracle.✓Native Python fitness (retire the Perl oracle).✓- Memetic search (current): canonical slicing genome + high-locality operators + Nelder-Mead inner loop.
Layout
src/homemaker_layout/dom.py— read/write Urb.domYAML into aNodetree.src/homemaker_layout/geometry.py— faithful port of Urb's top-down geometry.src/homemaker_layout/programme.py— parsepatterns.configspace requirements.src/homemaker_layout/solver.py— bottom-up ratio solve (scipy).src/homemaker_layout/fitness.py— native Python fitness evaluator.src/homemaker_layout/fitness_cmd.py—homemaker-fitnessCLI (drop-in forurb-fitness.pl).src/homemaker_layout/graph.py— leaf-adjacency graph for programme-driven checks.src/homemaker_layout/genome.py— topology genome: base-floor tree + per-storey deltas.src/homemaker_layout/operators.py— high-locality mutation and subtree crossover.src/homemaker_layout/innerloop.py— ratio optimisation inner loop (Nelder-Mead / CMA-ES).src/homemaker_layout/driver.py— memetic search outer loop.src/homemaker_layout/evolve.py—homemaker-evolveCLI entry point.src/homemaker_layout/oracle.py— legacy Perl shim, kept for cross-validation only.