a7ef9e2fa0
Owner: "I think a corridor could be worth a sixth of a room, this is ok. maybe we should dump the ratio_circulation altogether if there is already a pressure in circulation caused by the cost benefit ratio per msq. this is the kind of thing we want to root out of the scoring model: anything that is double counting, or using a gaussian where a linear ramp is appropriate, etc." value_circulation = 50 stands; hxi's rate question is closed. The duplication argument is stronger than it first looks. score = value/cost is already a ratio, so the per-m2 economics (50 against a build cost of 200) is not merely an absolute pressure -- adding corridor moves value/cost by an amount that depends on how much of the building is already corridor. It is ALREADY proportional. ratio_circulation said the same thing again as a whole-building multiplier, on a curve where twice the corridor is far more than twice as bad. Correction to my own first measurement: I overrode ratio_circulation and got scores going DOWN when a <=1 multiplier was removed, which is impossible. All four corpus programmes DECLARE ratio_circulation, so the CONF_DEFAULTS value I had changed was never in play and the two arms differed only in sigma. Same trap as value_supported in 39.19. Against the keep-it case, recorded because it is the one real argument: three of four declare a POSITIVE target (harbor/maple 0.08, health-centre 0.10), making the term formally two-sided rather than "less is better". It does not survive the numbers -- the lower side is worth at most 13.3% on the large programmes against 99% on the upper side, and "a building needs some circulation" is enforced structurally by access and connectivity, which no amount of value can buy off. Disabled in CONF_DEFAULTS and the four corpus configs, each with the reason inline and a note that a [target, sigma] pair re-enables it. Fail sets unchanged; it was always a value multiplier. Scores +42% to +7712%. 39.24 also sweeps every remaining term against the owner's two tests. Verdicts: perpendicular, proportion, width, crinkliness, access, size's lower side, ratio_outside, staircase volume and the count/limit fails are all sound. Filed as homemaker-py-dpt: size's UPPER side (cost already charges area; 82% of size fails are over-target), the minimum-internal-area factor (a third statement of "build the rooms"), the 0.5**n_fails curve (a ruling, not a measurement), and two dead paths -- ratio_public/private_outside, which no config declares, and the daylight factor pinned to 1.0 since the descope. Also updated a test I added last turn which asserted ratio_circulation was the second charge; it now pins that the linear ramp is the ONLY one. 419 passed. Closes homemaker-py-hxi. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB
378 lines
6.7 KiB
Text
378 lines
6.7 KiB
Text
---
|
|
# Health Centre - Non-synthetic third example programme (homemaker-py-9yx)
|
|
#
|
|
# y51's synthetic n=10/14/18/22 sweep (DESIGN.md 24, extended by xyu 31) scales
|
|
# room count by duplicating a handful of already-interchangeable programme-house
|
|
# codes (b1/t1/b2/t2/l1) via `count:`. harbor-house has real room-type diversity
|
|
# (16 distinct codes) but is out of range at 37 room instances, and its own
|
|
# result stayed null-to-negative -- so it cannot distinguish "the effect needs
|
|
# more rooms than harbor-house has" from "the effect never existed outside the
|
|
# duplicated-code mechanism". This programme fills the gap: a genuinely
|
|
# different building type (a small primary-care health centre, not a house or
|
|
# a dormitory/co-housing facility) with 19 distinct, individually-sized room
|
|
# codes at n=20 room instances -- matching xyu's own n=18 test point without
|
|
# leaning on `count:` as the scaling knob (only one deliberate, realistic
|
|
# duplication: two public WCs).
|
|
#
|
|
# Code conventions (per maple-court, homemaker-py-leu.1): generic c/o/s are
|
|
# reserved for circulation / outside / sahn in fitness.py's get_space_params
|
|
# (any code starting with 's' silently falls back to the *_outside defaults
|
|
# instead of its own size/width/proportion targets) -- so no room code here
|
|
# starts with c, o, or s.
|
|
|
|
# Building programme: small primary-care health centre
|
|
spaces:
|
|
# ---- PUBLIC / RECEPTION ----
|
|
rc1:
|
|
usage: none
|
|
name: Reception
|
|
size:
|
|
- 10.0
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.9
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
level: 0
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- o
|
|
|
|
wa1:
|
|
usage: none
|
|
name: Waiting Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 28.0
|
|
- 5.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 5.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.8
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
level: 0
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- o
|
|
- rc1
|
|
|
|
ph1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Pharmacy / Dispensary
|
|
size:
|
|
- 12.0
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.1
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
level: 0
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- o
|
|
- wa1
|
|
|
|
# ---- CLINICAL ----
|
|
gp1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: GP Consulting Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 14.0
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.2
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.4
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
ms1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Minor Surgery Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 20.0
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 4.7
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.3
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
# homemaker-py-1s3 (§26 path b): two similar-scale clinical procedure
|
|
# rooms, flexible enough to double up in a small practice.
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- de1
|
|
|
|
de1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Dental Surgery
|
|
size:
|
|
- 18.0
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 4.6
|
|
- 0.7
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- zt1
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- ms1
|
|
|
|
zt1:
|
|
usage: utility
|
|
name: Sterilisation Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 6.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- de1
|
|
|
|
pt1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Physiotherapy Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 24.0
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 4.8
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
qr1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Counselling Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 9.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.6
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.4
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
tr1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Treatment Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 16.0
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.3
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.4
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
# ---- ADMIN / STAFF ----
|
|
mo1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Manager's Office
|
|
size:
|
|
- 10.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.8
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
# homemaker-py-1s3: a small practice's manager's office and admin office
|
|
# are a natural loose-fit pairing.
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- ao1
|
|
|
|
ao1:
|
|
usage: bedroom
|
|
name: Admin Office
|
|
size:
|
|
- 14.0
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- mo1
|
|
- br1
|
|
|
|
re1:
|
|
crinkliness: none # no window needed
|
|
usage: utility
|
|
name: Records Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 7.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.7
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- ao1
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- dp1
|
|
|
|
br1:
|
|
usage: living
|
|
name: Staff Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 16.0
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.4
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- ao1
|
|
|
|
kt1:
|
|
usage: kitchen
|
|
name: Staff Kitchenette
|
|
size:
|
|
- 8.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.7
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- br1
|
|
|
|
# ---- SERVICE ----
|
|
me1:
|
|
crinkliness: none # no window needed
|
|
usage: utility
|
|
name: Plant / Mechanical Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 9.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.9
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.7
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
dp1:
|
|
crinkliness: none # no window needed
|
|
usage: utility
|
|
name: General Storage
|
|
size:
|
|
- 8.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.8
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.7
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
co_locate:
|
|
- re1
|
|
|
|
t9:
|
|
usage: toilet
|
|
name: Public WC
|
|
size:
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
- 0.3
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
count: 2
|
|
|
|
t10:
|
|
usage: toilet
|
|
name: Staff WC
|
|
size:
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
- 0.6
|
|
width:
|
|
- 1.4
|
|
- 0.3
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.6
|
|
- 0.4
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
# Building constraints
|
|
storey_minimum: 1
|
|
storey_limit: 2
|
|
force_roof_garden: 0
|
|
|
|
# homemaker-py-hxi (DESIGN.md §39.24): disabled. The score is value/cost, a
|
|
# ratio, so the per-m2 economics (circulation worth 50 against a build cost of
|
|
# 200) is ALREADY a proportional pressure against circulation -- this said the
|
|
# same thing a second time, and with a curve where twice the corridor is far
|
|
# more than twice as bad. Its other side, "a building needs some circulation",
|
|
# was worth at most 13% here and is enforced structurally anyway by the access
|
|
# and connectivity checks. Set a [target, sigma] pair to re-enable.
|
|
ratio_circulation:
|
|
|
|
ratio_outside:
|
|
- 0.06
|
|
- 0.05
|
|
|
|
staircase_min: 1
|
|
staircase_max: 2
|
|
|
|
value_inside: 300.0
|
|
value_circulation: 50.0
|
|
value_outside: 100.0
|
|
# homemaker-py-ecx (DESIGN.md §39.19): an upper-level terrace is worth what
|
|
# outdoor space is worth (value_outside); it is the COST that differs by level
|
|
# (outside 10.0 vs outside_supported 110.0), not the value. At 300.0 -- the
|
|
# `value_inside` rate -- a terrace was worth more per square metre than a real
|
|
# internal room, which the owner ruled out.
|
|
value_supported: 100.0
|