Owner's decision: "we need to abandon the perl oracle, this was only useful when initially porting, but I suspect many of the remaining problems have been carried in from the perl (such as the weird scoring of outdoor and circulation space, which definitely needs fixing)". 39 supports that second clause. Every defect the section found is inherited, not introduced: the two-sided crinkliness gaussian that double-charges surplus daylight (39.14), quality as a product over a variable number of factors (39.18), value_supported priced as value_inside so a terrace was worth more per m2 than a room (39.19), and circulation returning 0.07 per unit cost (hxi). So parity with the oracle was never a safety net -- it was a commitment to reproduce those defects. Each of 39.14, 39.18 and 39.19 would have been a parity failure had parity ever been checked, and keeping the tests would have meant reverting the fixes or explaining the failures away. Removed: oracle.py, test_oracle.py, the two parity tests and their fixture machinery in test_dom_corpus.py, innerloop.OracleEvaluator with its use_native and urb_root plumbing, the same plumbing through driver, and fourteen experiments/ scripts that could only run against Perl. Several of those are cited in earlier DESIGN sections; the citations now point into git history, which is the honest state -- they had been unrunnable since the oracle root (/home/bruno/src/urb) stopped being present. run_search is superseded by run_search_scaled, which does the same job natively. Kept: dump_areas.pl/.py, which validate GEOMETRY against Urb (4.1) rather than fitness, and the prose in fitness_cmd.py and dom.py explaining why the .score/.fails formats are shaped as they are. Provenance is worth keeping; a dead code path is not. CLAUDE.md updated: fitness.py is the only evaluator, and "Urb did it this way" is no longer an argument that a constant is right. 39.16 is the standing counterweight in the other direction -- the crinkliness target WAS right and twice looked wrong only because the code reading it was misunderstood. Inheritance is neither evidence for nor against. 410 passed. The 69 removed cases account exactly: 64 parity (all skipped, since no oracle .score was ever committed), 4 in test_oracle.py, and the guard test 39.20 added as a stopgap. Closes homemaker-py-118. Files homemaker-py-bk9 for the re-baseline that 39.19 made necessary. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB |
||
|---|---|---|
| .beads | ||
| .claude | ||
| examples | ||
| experiments | ||
| src/homemaker_layout | ||
| tests | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| DESIGN.md | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
homemaker-layout
Programme-driven building-layout search over slicing trees. A clean-room Python successor to the Perl Urb project, intended to eventually be 100% Python.
Why a rewrite
Urb represents a building as a binary slicing tree where room sizes are derived top-down from division ratios. That makes room area an emergent property of every cut above it, which:
- gives the genome low locality (a cut near the root rescales every descendant),
- makes target room sizes nearly impossible to hit, so the gaussian size penalty dominates fitness, and
- defeats crossover (transplanted subtrees lose their proportions).
homemaker inverts this: leaves carry target dimensions from the programme and division ratios are solved bottom-up for a fixed topology. The evolutionary search then only explores topology + types + adjacency.
Phase plan
Solver experiment: port Urb's geometry, re-solve ratios from programme targets, score the result against the original via the Perl oracle.✓Native Python fitness (retire the Perl oracle).✓Memetic search: canonical slicing genome + high-locality operators + Nelder-Mead inner loop.✓Penalty reshaping: lexicographic✓(-n_fails, fitness)outer-search comparison.Representation upgrade: canonical slicing encoding + bottom-up shape feasibility, scaled to larger programmes.✓- Search-quality experiments (current): a long running series of
opt-in levers tried against the
harbor-house,health-centre, andprogramme-houseexample corpora — leaf-sharing, finish-time cell→room collapse, ruin-and-recreate LNS, 2-opt polish, multi-use/co-located leaves, adjacency-graph and bubble-diagram fitness signals, and more. Most of these are negative/null results kept as opt-in flags or reference code rather than defaults. SeeDESIGN.md§11 onward for the full, numbered experiment log with methodology and results for each.
Layout
src/homemaker_layout/dom.py— read/write Urb.domYAML into aNodetree.src/homemaker_layout/geometry.py— faithful port of Urb's top-down geometry.src/homemaker_layout/programme.py— parsepatterns.configspace requirements.src/homemaker_layout/solver.py— bottom-up ratio solve (scipy).src/homemaker_layout/fitness.py— native Python fitness evaluator.src/homemaker_layout/fitness_cmd.py—homemaker-fitnessCLI (drop-in forurb-fitness.pl).src/homemaker_layout/collapse_cmd.py—homemaker-collapseCLI: finish-time global cell→room relabel of a.dom.src/homemaker_layout/graph.py— leaf-adjacency graph for programme-driven checks.src/homemaker_layout/genome.py— topology genome: base-floor tree + per-storey deltas.src/homemaker_layout/operators.py— high-locality mutation and subtree crossover.src/homemaker_layout/innerloop.py— ratio optimisation inner loop (Nelder-Mead / CMA-ES).src/homemaker_layout/driver.py— memetic search outer loop.src/homemaker_layout/evolve.py—homemaker-evolveCLI entry point.src/homemaker_layout/oracle.py— legacy Perl shim, kept for cross-validation only.src/homemaker_layout/bubble.py— 3D bubble-diagram adjacency fitness-signal prototype (DESIGN.md §27); validated null, not wired intofitness.py— reference only.
Room codes and reserved names
Leaf types live in three namespaces that share a first character. Only the first is enforced; the other two are conventions the fitness function reads, so a room's spelling can change how it is scored.
1. Generic structural types — C, O, S (reserved). The leaves the
search itself creates: C circulation, O outside, S sahn (an outside court
that also serves as circulation). Always uppercase. A programme code spelled
exactly C, O or S is rejected at load.
2. Programme room codes — anything else, lowercase. k1, b1, cr1,
of, and single-character codes like r or t. These may start with any
letter: since DESIGN.md §39.4 the generic tests match C/O/S exactly, so
naming a room cr1 no longer makes it circulation. (Before that fix it did —
and silently dropped it from the required-space check entirely.)
3. Access requirements — the usage: attribute. Every space declares one
of living, kitchen, bedroom, toilet, utility, none. Mandatory, no
fallback, and a missing or unknown value is a load error. It replaced a
first-character convention (b/t/l/k) under which a room silently
inherited another room's connectivity rules from its spelling — la1 "Laundry
Room" was trimmed as a living room (DESIGN.md §39.7).
spaces:
la1:
usage: utility # controlled, drives engine behaviour
name: Laundry Room # free text, building-specific
A usage value exists only where the engine treats it differently, so the vocabulary is closed: a new access class means new code, not new config. Check a programme with:
python experiments/audit_programme_config.py
which reports reserved-name collisions, the usage class each code picks up, and whether each room's size/width/proportion/crinkliness targets are mutually satisfiable at all.