7ec4e5d121
Supersedes the previous commit's approach. Renaming harbor's four colliding
codes fixed one programme; tightening the matching rule fixes the rule, so a
room may be called anything. cr1/of/st1/st2 are restored and the examples are
byte-identical to their pre-§39 state -- which also means existing .dom
artefacts (evolved-3M*) stay valid, so migrate_ju3_rename.py is deleted.
The rule: Urb has exactly three GENERIC structural types (get_space_types:
qw/C O S/), the leaves the search creates. Measured across the corpus: 154 C,
110 O, 1 S, not one lowercase generic -- while every programme code is
lowercase, including single-character ones (r, t, m, n). Case is the
discriminator, not length. Every generic test was type[0].lower() in (...), a
case-insensitive PREFIX that swept up any programme code starting with those
letters; they now match the generic set exactly. 30 sites across dom, fitness,
graph, operators, programme, shapecurve and bubble.
NOT applied to the SEMANTIC prefixes: l/k/b/t classify programme codes by first
letter (graph.py builds bedroom<->toilet and kitchen<->living relations from
them) and stay prefix-based. Where the namespaces were mixed in one expression
they were split -- has_circulation's ("b","l","k","c") is three semantic
prefixes plus dom.is_circulation; access()'s ("l","c","s") is semantic l plus
the generic circulation set.
New: dom.GENERIC_{CIRCULATION,OUTSIDE,TYPES} + is_generic(); fitness.
_generic_class(), replacing the _t0 dispatch in quality_size/quality_width/
quality_proportion/value_rate -- the four terms that mattered most and that a
first sweep missed, since they dispatch through a t0 variable rather than an
inline test. graph._adjacency_target resolves a generic adjacency requirement
(programmes write "adjacency: [c, o]") to the generic set while every other
requirement keeps Perl's prefix semantics.
Two subtleties: S is in both generic sets but takes the OUTSIDE parameter
families -- a first translation tested circulation first and silently gave S
the circulation params, caught by test_get_space_params_sahn_proportion. And
validate_codes survives, narrowed to a code spelled exactly C/O/S, which is a
genuine ambiguity; merely starting with c/o/s is now fine.
Invariant asserted as a test: test_scoring_is_invariant_under_programme_code_
spelling relabels one tree and its config together and re-scores. Bit-identical
across 12 comparisons (6 seeds x collapse on/off).
Re-baseline (seed 1, 20k, original names): 58 fails (15 hard / 43 soft) against
the real 37-instance programme, with cr1 at 79.1 m2 vs declared 80 (was 32.9
and 17.1), of/st1/st2 all present and in band, and one fail naming any of them.
57 -> 58 on a 5-instance-harder programme is within noise: "did not regress".
Fallout (§39.5): 2g7.5's CP-SAT seeder win does not survive. Over 6 seeds --
harbor real 102/114 (cpsat loses), harbor old-effective 98/99 (tie, so the win
was already marginal), maple-court 156/144 (cpsat wins). maple is the control:
the solver did not regress, harbor's programme changed. Test xfail'd with that
reason plus a maple companion; both assign_solver flags stay default off.
Filed homemaker-py-w6x to re-check other narrow-margin harbor A/Bs.
345 passed, 1 xfailed, same 7 pre-existing fixture failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MJ84Feep79Hhm3E4zZJmnB
163 lines
2.5 KiB
Text
163 lines
2.5 KiB
Text
---
|
|
# Harbor House L0 - single-storey de-risk variant (homemaker-py-c4c.1)
|
|
#
|
|
# Built from harbor-house by retaining ONLY the 10 space codes explicitly
|
|
# marked `level: 0`. The straddling anonymous spaces (n=neighborhood, t=bathroom)
|
|
# carry no explicit level key and are dropped here so the programme is an
|
|
# unambiguous single-storey set. Adjacencies are pruned to the retained codes
|
|
# (all remaining refs are to c/o or to retained codes k1/da1).
|
|
#
|
|
# Purpose: isolate per-floor CONSTRUCTION difficulty from multi-storey COUPLING.
|
|
|
|
spaces:
|
|
cr1:
|
|
name: Common Room with Fireplace
|
|
size:
|
|
- 80.0
|
|
- 10.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 6.0
|
|
- 1.5
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- o
|
|
|
|
ef1:
|
|
name: Entrance Foyer
|
|
size:
|
|
- 15.0
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
da1:
|
|
name: Dining Area
|
|
size:
|
|
- 60.0
|
|
- 8.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 5.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- k1
|
|
- o
|
|
|
|
k1:
|
|
name: Kitchen
|
|
size:
|
|
- 30.0
|
|
- 5.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- da1
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
ws1:
|
|
name: Workshop Space
|
|
size:
|
|
- 40.0
|
|
- 6.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 5.0
|
|
- 1.0
|
|
proportion:
|
|
- 1.8
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
- o
|
|
|
|
m:
|
|
name: Meeting Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 10.0
|
|
- 2.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
count: 3
|
|
|
|
la1:
|
|
name: Laundry Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 20.0
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
st1:
|
|
name: Ground Floor Storage
|
|
size:
|
|
- 22.0
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.0
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
me1:
|
|
name: Mechanical/Electrical Room
|
|
size:
|
|
- 25.0
|
|
- 4.0
|
|
width:
|
|
- 3.5
|
|
- 0.8
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
|
|
of:
|
|
name: Staff Office
|
|
size:
|
|
- 12.5
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
width:
|
|
- 2.5
|
|
- 0.5
|
|
adjacency:
|
|
- c
|
|
count: 2
|
|
|
|
# Building constraints — single storey
|
|
storey_minimum: 1
|
|
storey_limit: 1
|
|
force_roof_garden: 0
|
|
|
|
# Circulation ratio
|
|
ratio_circulation:
|
|
- 0.08
|
|
- 0.15
|
|
|
|
# Outside space ratio (courtyard requirement)
|
|
ratio_outside:
|
|
- 0.15
|
|
- 0.10
|
|
|
|
# Staircase requirements (single storey: minimum is forced to 1 by the
|
|
# fitness `or 1` default, so we keep exactly one)
|
|
staircase_min: 1
|
|
staircase_max: 1
|
|
|
|
# Economic parameters
|
|
value_inside: 300.0
|
|
value_circulation: 50.0
|
|
value_outside: 100.0
|
|
value_supported: 300.0
|