Python rewrite of the Urb/Homemaker stack
Find a file
Bruno Postle 497d05c343 Add programme/solver/oracle + sizing experiments (negative result)
Adds the bottom-up ratio solver, programme parser, Perl-oracle bridge,
and two experiments. Headline finding: the "isolated size solver on a
frozen topology" hypothesis is NOT validated.

- resolve_ratios.py: re-solving candidate-002 from programme targets
  recovers areas accurately but scores below the original (introduces
  width/perpendicular/crinkliness failures the area objective ignores).
- refine_sweep.py: warm-start refine of all 34 evolved candidates
  regresses 34/34 (fails 124->297 perpendicular-tied; 124->626 area-only
  with free skew). Moving cuts to fix room area breaks the coupled
  adjacency/access/shape constraints those designs balanced.

Conclusion: sizing is not separable from the rest of Urb's fitness;
a geometry inner loop must optimise the full objective, not an area proxy.
Geometry port remains validated byte-identical to Urb.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 21:49:31 +01:00
.claude Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00
experiments Add programme/solver/oracle + sizing experiments (negative result) 2026-06-10 21:49:31 +01:00
src/homemaker Add programme/solver/oracle + sizing experiments (negative result) 2026-06-10 21:49:31 +01:00
.gitignore Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00
CLAUDE.md Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00
pyproject.toml Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00
README.md Scaffold homemaker-py with validated geometry port 2026-06-10 20:50:20 +01:00

homemaker-py

Programme-driven building-layout search over slicing trees. A clean-room Python successor to the Perl Urb project, intended to eventually be 100% Python.

Why a rewrite

Urb represents a building as a binary slicing tree where room sizes are derived top-down from division ratios. That makes room area an emergent property of every cut above it, which:

  • gives the genome low locality (a cut near the root rescales every descendant),
  • makes target room sizes nearly impossible to hit, so the gaussian size penalty dominates fitness, and
  • defeats crossover (transplanted subtrees lose their proportions).

homemaker inverts this: leaves carry target dimensions from the programme and division ratios are solved bottom-up for a fixed topology. The evolutionary search then only explores topology + types + adjacency.

Phase plan

  1. Solver experiment (current): port Urb's geometry, re-solve ratios from programme targets, score the result against the original via the Perl oracle.
  2. Native Python fitness (retire the Perl oracle).
  3. Canonical slicing encoding (normalized Polish expression) + memetic search.

Layout

  • src/homemaker/dom.py — read/write Urb .dom YAML into a Node tree.
  • src/homemaker/geometry.py — faithful port of Urb's top-down geometry.
  • src/homemaker/programme.py — parse patterns.config space requirements.
  • src/homemaker/solver.py — bottom-up ratio solve (scipy).
  • src/homemaker/oracle.py — Phase-1 scaffold: score a .dom via Urb's urb-fitness.pl.

The Perl oracle is the only throwaway component; everything else is permanent.