Bruno Postle
497d05c343
Adds the bottom-up ratio solver, programme parser, Perl-oracle bridge, and two experiments. Headline finding: the "isolated size solver on a frozen topology" hypothesis is NOT validated. - resolve_ratios.py: re-solving candidate-002 from programme targets recovers areas accurately but scores below the original (introduces width/perpendicular/crinkliness failures the area objective ignores). - refine_sweep.py: warm-start refine of all 34 evolved candidates regresses 34/34 (fails 124->297 perpendicular-tied; 124->626 area-only with free skew). Moving cuts to fix room area breaks the coupled adjacency/access/shape constraints those designs balanced. Conclusion: sizing is not separable from the rest of Urb's fitness; a geometry inner loop must optimise the full objective, not an area proxy. Geometry port remains validated byte-identical to Urb. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| dump_areas.pl | ||
| dump_areas.py | ||
| refine_sweep.py | ||
| resolve_ratios.py | ||